Log InSign UpTest Portal LoginHindi

Is Denying Intimacy 'Cruelty'? Delhi High Court Decides-A Detailed Analysis

Is Denying Intimacy 'Cruelty'? Delhi High Court Decides-A Detailed Analysis



In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court has decreed that the wilful denial of a sexual relationship by a spouse can be categorized as cruelty. This pivotal judgment pertained to a case where a couple's marriage endured for a mere 35 days due to the non-consummation of their marriage.

Key Outcomes of the Verdict

The Significance of Intimacy in Marriage
The High Court, in its judgment, has firmly asserted the significance of physical intimacy within the marital bond. It highlighted that a marriage devoid of sexual intimacy could lead to severe dissatisfaction and disappointment. Such a lack of conjugal fulfillment is detrimental, with the court labeling it as potentially "fatal to marriage".

The Particulars of the Case

●    Duration of Marriage: The relationship between the parties in question lasted for barely over a month. Despite its brief duration, it was marred by deprivation of conjugal rights and the failure to consummate the marriage.
Accusations and Claims: The wife, during this period, lodged a police complaint alleging dowry harassment. However, the court found that the presented evidence lacked substance and consistency.
 The Verdict: Conclusively, the Delhi High Court upheld the family court's decision to grant the divorce, asserting that the wife's denial to engage in a sexual relationship amounts to cruelty.

Notable Observations by Justice Suresh Kumar Kait

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait, who presided over the bench, rejected the wife's appeal against the initial family court order. He emphasized that in certain cases, the "marriage without sex is an anathema". Furthermore, Justice Kait pointed out that there was an absence of tangible evidence to support the wife's claims of dowry harassment.

Historical Context: Previous Judgments and their Implications
Historically, various courts have observed that the deliberate refusal of a spouse to engage in a sexual relationship, especially in the early stages of marriage, can be grounds for divorce due to cruelty. Such refusals, when prolonged over extensive periods (as witnessed in the case discussed, spanning over 18 years), can inflict mental trauma and anguish.
Moreover, making unfounded allegations, such as those related to dowry harassment which subsequently lead to legal implications, can also be perceived as acts of cruelty if they lack concrete evidence.


The Larger Impact on Society

The court's judgment underscores the significance of mutual respect, understanding, and physical intimacy within the realm of marital bonds. By addressing such sensitive topics, the judgment aims to set a precedent for the resolution of similar cases in the future.


The Delhi High Court's ruling serves as a poignant reminder of the multi-faceted aspects of marital relationships and the intricate dynamics that govern them. By addressing the significance of intimacy, the court not only highlights the essence of marriage but also establishes clear parameters for what constitutes cruelty within this bond.

copyright 2022 Ojaank Foundation.